The painting was confirmed as the original work of Rembrandt after the thorough examination of the painting in the lecture. There are several reasons which clarified that the validity of painting.
First, after the research done through
x- ray and pigmentation, it had been revealed out that colours were painted over the top of the original painting 100 years ago to increase the value of painting of an aristocratic woman. So, the first doubt casted in the passage about the inconsistency of Rembrandt's work had been settled.
Second, he was known to master of painting light and shadow which was seem to be absent in the painting according to the passage. But, the lecture maintained the authenticity of the point by explaining the fact that when the fore colours were removed from the top of the original painting, it was about a simple clothed woman wearing a light colored cloak which reflected light. That is why there was no partial shadow in the face.
Third, inorder to enlarge the painting, additional pieces of wood were glued together over the back of painting to give it a grand look. However, the original painting was made with a single piece of wood. From the research, the information had been fathomed that same piece of wood from same tree was used in his self portrait wearing a hat.
Therefore, it was concluded as the original work by Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 71, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
... of painting light and shadow which was seem to be absent in the painting according ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88510638298 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59326704217 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5287341327 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.363636364 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463456637302 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178941685176 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823767557674 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214242713566 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101336081276 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.