Both the reading and the passage are discussing a specific painting. The passage asserts that this painting does not belong to the Rembrandt and provides several reasons. However, the professor in the lecture believes that Rembrandt painted this painting originally and refutes all the author's reasons.
At first, the passage states that the woman's dress in the painting is luxurious. On the other hand, Rembrandt did not mind to dress, hence, this painting does not belong to him. However, the professor in the lecture asserts that an X-ray experiment showed that Rembrandt originally painted it and later other person added some pigment on the original painting and made the woman's dress more colorful than before.
Second, the author of the passage makes the point that light and shadows in this painting are not fit together. Also, in Rembrandt's painting, shallows and light are always fit to each other; hence, this does not belong to him. The professor casts doubt on this point and illustrates that in the original painting that is under the pigments, shadows of the woman's face are correct. The added pigments on the painting made the woman's face white and disappeared the shadows.
Finally, the author points to the pieces of wood in the back of the painting. He explains that the Rembrandt's paintings are on one piece of wood, not several attached pieces; hence, this is not the Rembrandt's painting. However, the professor challenges this point and explains that the original painting is on one piece of wood. He then mentions that someone wanted to make the painting big and added some pieces to the top of the painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some pieces to the top of the painting.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99633699634 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42295440455 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410256410256 0.540411800872 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1899190325 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390704230645 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167161581247 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789392621892 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276201516812 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112623699558 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.