In this set of material, the passage and the lecture offer two opposing points of view about whether the painting of a lady is one of Rembrandt's work of art or not. While the passage argues this painting cannot consider as one of this artist's works and provides three reasons of support, the lecture states that recently, thorough researches have been shown that this painting actually belongs to Rembrandt.
First, the passage declares owing to the fact that there is an inconsistent thing about the way that the woman in the painting dressed up, it could not be one of his works because he is known from his attention to what his subject wore. In contrast, the lecture throws down this notion by illustrating the fact that X-ray examination of the painting has disclosed the fact that fur color was added to the original painting many years after it was painted in order to make it more valuable by someone else.
Second, the article asserts Rembrandt was the master of painting light and shadows and these elements do not fit in this painting. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this statement by pointing out the point that the original dress that the woman wears in original painting causes this light and shadows which are relevant because the woman wears a white dress that instigates the face to be light.
Finally, the author claims that due to the fact that this painting is painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glow together, it cannot be one of Rembrandt works because he did not paint on this kind of panel. In contradict, the speaker points out the fact that this panel was added to the painting at the same time the fur color added to it in order to make it more valuable. In addition, she states that the main panel of this work is originated from the same tree as one of his other work's panel( a self-portrait in which he wears a hat) comes from. It strongly indicates that the portrait has been discussing belongs to Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...this painting cannot consider as one of this artists works and provides three reason...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, second, so, while, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59544159544 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3604018693 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464387464387 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0589535972 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.3 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1 21.698381199 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475480409717 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209022653374 0.0996497079465 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845727687191 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301388435936 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387817224732 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.