In this set of material, the passage and the lecture offer two opposing points of view about the advantages of the utilization of ethanol instead of gasoline. While the passage argues that the disadvantages of this idea outweigh the advantages and provides three reasons to support its viewpoint, the lecture emphasizes that none of these reasons are convincing.
First, the passage asserts that using ethanol instead of gasoline will not be a help with reducing the number of green gases in the atmosphere which, leads to global warming, due to the fact that when ethanol burns, it reveals carbon dioxide, likewise gasoline. The lecture challenges this point by explaining the process in which ethanol is achieved. Ethanol comes from a kind of plant called corn. The speaker argues the cultivation of this plant will reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, due to the fact that plants need carbon dioxide for their growth.
In addition, the article declares that the source of this fuel is the animals' food and exploiting this source follows by a reduction in animals' population due to the lack of food.
Finally, the author takes the price of the ethanol under question by arguing that the current similarity in the price of gasoline and ethanol is because of the government's subsidies and if the government cuts off this subsides, the price of ethanol would increase dramatically. On the other hand, the lecture claims if people start to advocate an ethanol company, as a result of more demands, the price of ethanol will decrease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...res that the source of this fuel is the animals food and exploiting this source follows...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, likewise, so, while, in addition, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59229025224 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9096742836 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421420525114 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162950427452 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789257277985 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214800487878 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116906153436 0.0443174109184 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.