TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him.
The page and the lecturer are discussing Rembrandt as a possible author of a seventeenth century painting.
The passage indicates that the details of the paintings are not coherent as they contradict each other and therefore, Rembrandt could not have made these mistakes and thus, he is not the author of the painting. However, the lecturer explains that experts found out that colors were added over the top modifying the aspect of the painting and these errors cannot be attributed to Rembrandt.
Secondly, the passage underlines another argument to refute Rembrandt as the painter. The light and shadow technics are not respected in the painting in a way that Rembrandt could not have make this mistake due to his skills and ability to paint. Nevertheless, the lecturer qualifies this theory saying that more than one layer of colors can be found on this painting. Indeed, a second layer of color as added to enlighten the painting.
Finally, the amount of wood panel cast doubt on the painting as Rembrandt was not used to paint on many wood panels for one painting as the passage shows. The lecturer challenges again this argument as the wood panels were added years after Rembrandt painted this woman in order to make the painting more valuable. Besides, the wood of the painting is the same one than another painting of Rembrandt which confirms that he is the author of the woman painting according to the lecturer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95020746888 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53702460808 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477178423237 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4994117606 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465633600145 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199379750426 0.0996497079465 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126504463575 0.0662205650399 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269635644676 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124633503892 0.0443174109184 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.