The article gives an explanation about the endotherms and how the dinosaurs can be proved to be endotherms. The article provides three evidences to prove the endothermic nature of dinosaurs. However, the professor opposes this article. The professor provides three reasons and also gives the related explanations for holding such opinions.
The article states that the dinosaurs in polar regions had endothermic capabilities since some of the fossils of the dinosaurs are found. But the professor refutes this saying that the polar region's today's temperature is much colder than it was. The professor also states that the dinosaurs dwell in polar regions during warmer season and could have moved or undergone hibernation during colder season.
The article averts that if the legs are situated below the body, then those animal are endothermic. Whereas, the professor denies this theory and states that dinosaurs are very large animals. In order to maintain their body weight they had their legs just below their body. The professor views that location of the legs just below the body does not mean that they are endothermic.
The article expresses that presence of Haversian canals indicate that the animals are endothermic. While, the professor confutes saying that dinosaurs' growth was sporadic in nature. The body of dinosaur grew rapidly during warmer climate and had slow or no growth during colder times. This cycle of rapid growth and slow or no growth created growth rings in its bone structure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ions had endothermic capabilities since some of the fossils of the dinosaurs are found. But...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...icate that the animals are endothermic. While, the professor confutes saying that din...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ile, the professor confutes saying that dinosaurs growth was sporadic in nature. The body...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28215767635 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51054832901 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51867219917 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.407284887 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8666666667 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29015901118 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959321336254 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480873975572 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163967468913 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146149141536 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.