Overall, even the reading and the lecture discuss about the “great houses”. Both present opposite theories about the Chaco’s settlements from evidence.
First of all, the reading passage affirms that Chaco structures were purely residential, with each housing hundreds of people. Moreover, it is also affirmed that Chaco houses appear strikingly similar as well-known as apartment buildings. The lecturer affirms that outside the structure was like those ones, but inside, for many people live there as affirmed in the passage, it must have fireplaces to daily cooking. In the largest house, there’s one fireplace to a total of ten families.
In the second place, the reading said that Chaco people were grain maize, which could be stored for long periods of time without spoiling and could serve as a long-lasting supply of food. But, the lecturer said that they have not access to a container or big containers.
Third and last, the author’s reading claims that archeologists identified an enormous mound formed by material’s pile. Excavations of the mound revealed deposits containing a surprisingly large number of broken pots. Even though, the lecturer affirms that it is not supported the idea. It is said that there is a number of materials such as sand and construction tools, so hardly related to ceremonies as affirmed in the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Overall, even the reading and the lectur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...rms that outside the structure was like those ones, but inside, for many people live there...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fireplace to a total of ten families. In the second place, the reading said th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess to a container or big containers. Third and last, the author's readin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, such as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92409295467 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640552995392 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0270371651 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312810797397 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105260081803 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840389887214 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178669203242 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854208509109 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.