TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
In the set of materials, the reading passage and listening passage discuss about most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology, dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts. However, the both the author and lecturer have differents opinions about this point.
First of all, the reading passage claims that many valuable artifacts were lost and destroyed to construction projects. besides, the authors still affirms that The growth of Britain’s population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities. Even though, the listening passage affirms that the artifacts are preserved and building, as well as constructions in British cities.
In the second place, the author says that archaeology was funded mostly through government founds and grants. However, the lecturer pourpose the archaeology was funded through construction’s company, not government. It is a new source of funds.
Third and last, from perspective of reading passage, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Even though, the author oppose this argument saying that many experts achaeology know all of process of jobs, so is not difficult.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...and destroyed to construction projects. besides, the authors still affirms that The gro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, still, third, well, as well as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 182.0 270.72406181 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6043956044 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0789632169 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.33082044 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31312179267 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115578492856 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066607920652 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171351889098 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601037381252 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.