TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
The article states that there is some limitation due to the problems that archaeologists face and provide three reasons of support. The professor, however, explains that a new rule in 1990 was settled that changed the situation for archaeologists that improved their position. Furthermore, she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that many invaluable objects were lost in construction projects. The professor refutes this point by stating that before any new construction starts the government wanted specialists to examine the interest or value the place to preserve valuable artifacts from excavating.
Second, the article claims that financial support for research was inadequate. However, the professor contends that the archaeologists were working for construction companies and paid by them. In addition, she says that it was not the government that supported this work. It was companies and as a result, they had new financial support which was far greater than before.
Third, the reading averts that there were not enough available positions to be an archaeologist and they did not pay for the work. The lecturer opposes this point by saying that they have been paid much better than any time before and it was the reason that the number of scientists in this field raised as they could have a job as scientists or other jobs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81179261076 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.435910535 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264630083236 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104000548067 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463799644802 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155943460468 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422548419308 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.