Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Traveling is undeniably a crucial part of human life. As we all living a hectic life it would be a relief to relax and enjoy our lives by traveling. A controversial argument that is often raised regarding this topic is whether it would be better to travel alone without having anyone to guide you or not. If I were obliged to choose, I would think that the best way to travel is in a group led by someone professional for several reasons, on a few of which I will elaborate subsequently.

The first reason corroborating my view is that the chance of getting lost will significantly decrease. When people are going on a vacation together, even something like shops distracts them they could easily spot a large number of other families who are in the same group as them. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Two years ago, I went to Paris with my husband, Jack, with a tour. It was my childhood dream to lay under the Eiffel tower and rest with someone whom I want to be with. When I saw the tower I lost my control and run for it. I sat there and thought that finally, I am here with the love of my life. We were having a wonderful time but suddenly Jack noticed that we are lost and neither I nor Jack knew how to speak French so we could not ask people to find our way back. Fortunately, Jack spotted a couple from the group that was waiting near the tour guide and we joined them.

The second imperative reason is that the tour guides are chosen from people who are familiar with all of the parts of the place we travel to and it is easy to ask them to find a place that we have in mind. Also, since they are regularly in contact with other passengers they can guess where would be more fascinating for us to visit. My personal experience can shed light on this. About a month ago, I and my family went to India. India is a very big country and if we were not with a tour we definitely could not find the places we wanted. The tour guide knew all the malls there and easily answered us where we can find what we desire to. If he was not there to give us this information we had to spend most of our time finding a suitable place to buy souvenirs.

To sum it up, it will be beneficial to travel by a group and a person to guide. This is because not only does it lower the possibility of getting lost but we can also benefit from the guidance of the leader

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s distracts them they could easily spot a large number of other families who are in the same grou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...hosen from people who are familiar with all of the parts of the place we travel to and it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...us where we can find what we desire to. If he was not there to give us this inform...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, even so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.16956521739 4.8611393121 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35568230677 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495652173913 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4771560345 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77272727273 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142783800533 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044332936431 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403363757739 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089719068169 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180694263815 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.91 10.9000537634 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.