Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments and private companies should share their scientific discoveries with the rest of the world.
Without a shadow of a doubt, the scientific discoveries undeniably play an important role in human life as they are being used for the society and the country where the research take place. A controversial argument that often raised regarding this topic is whether the discoveries of the private companies and government should be exclusive or not. If I were obliged to opt, I would think that all the breakthroughs and new information should be shared with the rest of the world for several reasons, on a few of which I will elaborate consequently.
The first imperative reason is that countries are trying hard to widespread democracy and show that regardless of the human skin color and genetic, they are all equal. Never can humans reach to have a democratic world to live in, unless they get rid of the secrets and the monopoly advantageous technology. A compelling example to clarify this issue is to imagine that one country achieved an approach to overcome the lack of sufficient food by manipulating the plants' genes. Also one can argue that the country can sell the food or export the product, but in that case, the pauper countries which are not able to pay have to suffer from hunger and become extinct. Hence, this is exactly the opposite of the aim of equality to let others face famine.
The second reason corroborating my view is that sharing information with other countries helps them to improve. To explain more, there are severe obstacles that all the world struggle with like the disease, environmental issues, economic problems, and so forth. In some laboratories, the solution to many of the difficulties is found, however, the policy of that company or the selfish rule of that country prohibits the information to leak out. My own experience can shed light on this issue. I am a chemist and work in a company to refine the water of the oceans to drinkable water that is necessary for all living creatures. The farming industries in many places vanished as a result of inappropriate water they use for the products farmers plant. It is conspicuous that some countries are going to broke down since their first industry was cultivation. Had my company let this information release, that aforementioned country could get scape from further damage.
To sum it up, I strongly believe that all the scientific discoveries should be free to use by other governments and companies. This is because not only will it demonstrates all humans are the same, but it also helps the countries in trouble to defeat their problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
... of sufficient food by manipulating the plants genes. Also one can argue that the coun...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... food by manipulating the plants genes. Also one can argue that the country can sell...
^^^^
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'break'
Suggestion: break
...icuous that some countries are going to broke down since their first industry was cul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88194444444 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81837520776 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9775576454 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168009524175 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499196374941 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561727256916 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112079277013 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746694128044 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.