TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.
In the set of materials, both the reading passage and lecture discuss about the two possible explanations to decline in a coastal ecosystem when some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast. However, the both author’s and lecturer have differents opinions about this point.
First of all, the reading passage claims that pollution seemed the more likely cause, such as oil rigs and other sources of industrial chemical pollution along the Alaskan coast. Even though, the lecturer affirms that was not really find industrial chemical in a Alaskan coast, so this are not a consistent point about the pollution factor.
In the second place, the reading pourpose that otters was affecting other sea mammals as well, like predators, such as the orca could have the same effect. However, the lecturer says that probably easy orca decline too.
Third and last,the reading passage affirm that at some Alasckan locatoins the otter populations declined greatly, while at others they remained stable. Even though, the lecture refute this afirmation saying that It is a bad explication by orca predators, because the number of orca decline considerable, because orca It so large mammals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... not really find industrial chemical in a Alaskan coast, so this are not a consis...
^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...easy orca decline too. Third and last,the reading passage affirm that at some Ala...
^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able, because orca It so large mammals.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, so, third, well, while, such as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 189.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58384226816 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.08160047 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408853318725 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173932251146 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113760115801 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242666318535 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548620658749 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.