TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin

The reading passage suggests that the certificate the product of the wood company would not attract people. However, the professor made a counterclaim to each of the author's idea.

First and foremost, the passage states many advertisements says that their product has more advantage for them than others which breaks the guardian of people. On the other hand, the lecturer interprets that people access differently to commercial of the independent certification agency and company. According to him, people believe further for the commercials made by the independent agency which means the advertisement of the certified company will affect the people to buy it.

Secondly, the article indicates the people choose a cheap product whether it is certified or not and the price of the certified wood will be higher than others because they pay much money to the agency to acquire the certificate. In contrast, the lecturer discussed that people consider the difference in price if it is noticeably high. Furthermore, he also said if the expense of the two product is comparable, then people favor to get the most granted product.

Thirdly and lastly, the reading claims that most wood companies trade their product in the US rather than exporting it, so, they do not need that certificate. Nevertheless, the professor said that if the certified product sold well in the US, the foreign companies draw attention to it. Even though the companies ship their product or not, they have to receive a certificate in order to compete with the foreigners.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ssor made a counterclaim to each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the passa...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18650793651 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81835163634 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1598047475 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8181818182 7.06452816374 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347857629106 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129741386229 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090091343541 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208960616044 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674872635192 0.0443174109184 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.