The article states the how the eco-certified product is having its business in market and how are the consumers behavior towards these eco-certified products. It also gives three instances expressing how are the influence of the consumers on the eco-certified products. While, the professor, opposes the idea expressed in article and give three supporting reasons for contradicting.
First, the article states that Americans are persuaded by the touting companies and would not trust the advertising claims made by the eco-certified product manufacturing organizations. But, the professor confutes this statement. According to professor, Americans would definitely distinguish between products. They do seek for the product that sounds trustworthy.
Second, the article says that the Americans are concerned about the value of the price and are likely to go behind the product that are less expensive. But, as per the professor this is not true. As per the professor, he believes that Americans do care about the price of the product but at the same time they will also are concerned about the quality. Only if there is are two product which are having almost same price with five percent difference in the cost, then the people would go with the price that seems reasonable. The professor also says that Americans are also concerned about the nature and would like to preserve it.
Third, the article averts that it is unconvincing that American companies tries to keep up with the rest of the world. Whereas, the professor refutes this by saying that the American wood companies are definitely concerned about their international market. This is because, if Americans show slow progress in this matter, surely, the foreign companies would tent in the American markets. Hence, they are concerned about their competition in the international markets.
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 58
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 33
- A nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until their entry to their college 58
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: THE_HOW
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
The article states the how the eco-certified product is having its...
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
... its business in market and how are the consumers behavior towards these eco-certified pr...
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...or the product that sounds trustworthy. Second, the article says that the Americ...
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: CD_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'product' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'products'.
...t the quality. Only if there is are two product which are having almost same price with...
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to keep up with the rest of the world. Whereas, the professor refutes this by saying t...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34812286689 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87649943022 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467576791809 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7006864935 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9375 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315110491203 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10710335736 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674078850725 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192574925113 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904804259777 0.0443174109184 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.