Both the reading and the listening discuss the Chevalier de Seingalt memoir. The author describes that there are three main reasons to support the idea that Chevalier de Seingalt memoir is not the accurate and he disorders many events in the memoir. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and asserts that no memoir can possibly be correct in every detail, but Chevalier De Seingalt memoir is pretty accurate overall and it is a reliable historical source, and brings up three reasons and elucidate some evidence in order to refute what is mentioned in the reading passage.
First off all, the writer points out that he was not rich and wealthy due to the fact that he borrowed a large amount of money from a Swiss merchant. Nevertheless, the professor states that Chevalier de Seingalt spend huge amounts of money on gambling and parties, so he had wealth, but it was property so he should sell to get money. Therefore, he borrowed first until his assets convert into money. For this reason, borrowing money is not representative of being poor.
Second, according to the reading, the detractors are doubtful about the accuracy of the conversations that Chevalier place in the memoir. While, the lecturer brings up the idea that the chevalier wrote down all the conversations each night immediately after conversing and he kept them for many years. Moreover, persons who lived with him confirm the notes when he composed the memoir.
Third, the Chevalier's escape from the prison makes a lot of controversy among the critics. However, the speaker posits that many people who be in jail (other prisoners) had more politically powerful friends as he did, but none of them were able to escape. Besides, there are the evidence-based government that after he escaped from the prison the ceiling of his prison room was repaired, which strengthen the Chevalier’s claim about his escape from the prison.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...n this claim and asserts that no memoir can possibly be correct in every detail, but Chevali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00606060606 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66270366681 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6254429769 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47540069907 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15886659929 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659046226915 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225354391876 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965695273429 0.0443174109184 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.