The reading specifies that there are three main reasons to support the idea that memoir is not accurate and some events invented to be exciting. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and brings up three reasons to reject the specific points made in the reading passage.
First of all, the author asserts that he claimed he was wealthy in Switzerland whereas he borrowed money from a merchant. Nevertheless, the lecturer states he had many properties and wealth but they were not cash. It took time converting staff to cash. That is why he borrowed money.
Second, based on the reading the conversations between him and famous people are expressed too accurate. Indeed, it seems impossible he remembered details of their conversations after several years. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts the idea reasoning that he wrote whatever he remembered every nights right after conversations and he kept them for years.
Third, the reading proposes that his escape from the prison in Italy does not make sense. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses the idea due to many prisoners were stronger than him and his friends but they could not escape. Furthermore, after his escape prisons room repaired. These causes virtually show whatever he has written about his escape is right.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, whereas, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10900473934 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60115753649 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616113744076 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5967842816 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9230769231 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278231694937 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967254067994 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430746037359 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151456055752 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464005537972 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.