The reading states that buzzing has created a lot of discussions and many critics would like to see it banned. However, the buzzer states that the arguments brought by the author are misleading and give readers the wrong impression. He refutes each of the arguments.
First, the article states that the critics complain that consumers should know whether a person praising a product is being paid or not since we expect the truth from the people who do not have any motive to mislead us. The man says that the buzzers are the people who actually liked the product which is advertised not some ordinary people just to make good points about it. Therefore the buzzer really thinks that the product is great and he/she is not giving anybody incorrect information.
Second, critics claim that since buzzers pretend that they are just private individuals, consumers will hear them less critically than they do when they face advertisements on TV or somewhere else. The buzzer refutes this point and says that people usually ask many questions about the product's quality and services and buzzers also have to answer all the questions in order to convince the person.
Third, the critics point out that the worst consequence of this type of advertising is that when once we becomes aware that people we meet socially may be buzzers , we will become less trustful of people in general. However the buzzer mentions that this idea is stupid. He states that companies cannot recruit ordinary people just to give a product some compliments and the buzzer who likes the product usually ends up having a great relationship with the person who finally bought the item since they usually have the same taste for the products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ople just to make good points about it. Therefore the buzzer really thinks that the produ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...ype of advertising is that when once we becomes aware that people we meet socially may ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t people we meet socially may be buzzers , we will become less trustful of people ...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ome less trustful of people in general. However the buzzer mentions that this idea is s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, may, really, second, so, therefore, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90344827586 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39829062542 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.5742693505 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552216258836 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176368115678 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129057378465 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312558064631 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117483851181 0.0443174109184 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.