The reading and the lecture are both about the memory of Chevalier de Seingalt. The author of the reading doubt about the accuracy of his memory and gives three reasons to support his idea. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He believes that the memory of Chevalier de Seingalt is reliable.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that even though Chevalier de Seingalt claimed that he was very rich man and he spent a lot of money on parties and gambling, he borrowed amount of money from a merchant. This point is challenged by the lecture. He says that Chevalier de Seingalt loaned money does not mean that he was poor. Maybe while he was selling his property and he has not had money yet. That is why he borrowed money from Swiss merchant.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that he doubt about the accuracy of the conversations between him with Voltaire because it was written many years after the conversation happened. The lecture rebuts this argument. He refutes that a witness has proved that each night, after Chevalier de Seingalt had dialogue with his friends, He wrote what he talked to them into a books. That means what he has claimed about his conversation with Voltaire is true.
Finally, the author of the reading states that he did not believe that Chevalier de Seingalt escape from a prison in Venice, because he thinks that Chevalier de Seingalt had some friends in Venice who could help him to be freed from the prison. The lecture on the other hand, opposes this reason. He says that there were many other prisoners at that time had more friends in Venice than Chevalier de Seingalt had but, none of those prisoners could escape from the prison. Therefore, this idea cannot accept. Moreover, it is proved that after Chevalier de Seingalt escaped from the ceiling, people had to repair the ceil where Chevalier de Seingalt had escaped that proved that what he said was true
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ives three reasons to support his idea. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a book' or simply 'books'?
Suggestion: a book; books
...s, He wrote what he talked to them into a books. That means what he has claimed about h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7134502924 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31403146692 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441520467836 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6901072335 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399066053018 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142240821893 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864060757922 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263848353404 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441275701836 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.