The passage and the lecture are both mainly about the accuracy of Chevaliers memoir. The passage doubt that the Chevalier distorted or invented some details in the memoir for three suspectable events, while the lecture argues that there are reasonable explanation exist.
To begin with, the passage points out that the Chevalier borrowed money from a Swiss merchant while he was living in Switzerland, thus, it is doubtable that the Chevalier was rich in that period. On the other hand, the lecture states that the Chevalier sells his goods to become rich. In this case, when he run out of the money because of the expend on parties and gambling, and meanwhile, the cash cannot achieve from goods exchanging immediately, he is most likely to borrow money from others.
Besides, the passage indicates that the Chevalier wrote his conversations with Voltaire after several years, so that the articles cannot be accurate. On the contrary, the lecture proves that the Chevalier consulted with Voltaire every night in the period and he has already recorded some notes after some paricular conversation. When he wrote the conversations, he consulted the notes.
Meanwhile, the passage states that the Chevalier could use his relationship to escape from the poison, so the escape experience may not be right. However, the lecture also proves that some other more powerful people didn't escape. Besides, after the event, the prison repaired the sailing, which also could be an evidence that this experience could accur.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...when he run out of the money because of the expend on parties and gambling, and meanwhile,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...es that some other more powerful people didnt escape. Besides, after the event, the p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, may, so, thus, while, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21224489796 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58575858087 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534693877551 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2112891063 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367363779665 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142502727819 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700720546837 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215215478659 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059172251985 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.