The article and lecturer both discuss about Chevalier de Seingalt. Chevalier wrote his memoir recounting his life adventures. The article claims that he has distorted and falsely created many events in the memoir in order to get make it exciting and glamorous. In contrast, the lecturer casts several doubts on this claim. she thinks that the memoir depicts the real events for several reasons.
First of all, the author contends that Chevalier was not a very wealth person as there is evidence that he has taken loans from the swiss merchants. The lecturer refutes these claims by saying Chevalier was wealth and he got his wealth in the form of lands and other assets. Further she mentions thatChenalier often spent money on parties and gambiling and he took loans for temporary adjustments as convert these assets into money took time for him.
Secondly, the articles is mentions that the conversations Chevalier had with the Voltaire were very detailed and it is immposible to mention them in that detail after many years. In contrast the lecturer argues that the there is a evidence that Chevalier has noted all his conversation he had with Voltaire immediately and he is highly possible that he has referred to those notes while he was writing the memoir.
Finally, the author states that Chevalier’s escape from the prison mighh have happened with the help of his well connected friends and not by making a hole in the celling. However the lecturer refutes these claims by saying that there is a recorded evidence from the prison officials that the prision ceiling has had to be repaired after his escape.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...rer casts several doubts on this claim. she thinks that the memoir depicts the real...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e assets into money took time for him. Secondly, the articles is mentions that ...
^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...hem in that detail after many years. In contrast the lecturer argues that the there is a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t the lecturer argues that the there is a evidence that Chevalier has noted all h...
^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp of his well connected friends and not by making a hole in the celling. However...
^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d not by making a hole in the celling. However the lecturer refutes these claims by sa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98897058824 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54802222899 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7439583174 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443377043278 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162047710877 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079883820322 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261265420684 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436913624975 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.