Both reading and the lecture are about the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine which is replacement for the automobile's main source of power. The author of the reading thinks that the hydrogen-based-cell engine is the best beneficial way. However, the speaker of the lecture casts doubt the passage by proving disadvantage of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine.
First of all, from the text, the author believes that hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine can make us free from the problem about petroleum which can run out someday. The lecture opposes what the reading claims. She says that the pure liquid state of hydrogen which is for using the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine is almost impossible.
The reading points out that the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine is an attractive solution for many pollution problems because it can reduces the carbon dioxide. But, the lecturer believes that the process of making the pure hydrogen can pollute the environment;thus it is not environmental friendly.
The passage says that hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine is economically effective by spending less money than fuel energy. The speaker of the listening disagrees with what the passage believes. She thinks that the material for making pure hydrogen is expensive; if they use cheaper resources, it will be harder.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e from the problem about petroleum which can run out someday. The lecture opposes...
^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
... many pollution problems because it can reduces the carbon dioxide. But, the lecturer b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16542256263 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1745640272 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475379612185 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205840231468 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138151114902 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329532451846 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036042427016 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.