The lecture suggests if companies offer four-day week work to their workers, they profits will decrease. Because if they want to accomplish the same amount of work they should hiring more employees it seems payroll costs be the same do to four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate, but training and medical benefits would increase more workers need more offices and computers so all of these, results cut into company profits. While the passage includes four-day employees would make fewer costly errors, and while the payroll costs would be the same, the companies benefits would increase.
Secondly, the professor claims to offer the option of a working a four-day workweek would increase the companies expectations, they like to workers do the same amount of work in four days as they used to do it in five days and unemployment will be the same. On the contrary, the passage suggests for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week a new employee could be hired.
Finally, the lecture argues that the employees who work four days a week would take risks on their employment because in an economic downturn they would lose their jobs more easily and employers would prefer normal employees over them. On the other hand, the passage says four days work a week could improve the quality of employees life due to their more free time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'profit'
Suggestion: profit
...ur-day week work to their workers, they profits will decrease. Because if they want to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85957446809 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35664015695 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502127659574 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0413036842 49.2860985944 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.142857143 110.228320801 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 21.698381199 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.3589403974 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 53.8541721854 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.