TPO 11 - Integrated : a decline in reading the literature
In the reading passage, the author claims that a substantial drop in reading the literature including poem, novel and plays, particularly in juveniles, has an adverse effect on the whole of the society by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that a decline in the number of literature readers is closely associated with the decrease in the culture of the society. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that scientific, political and even historical books can provide intellectual stimulation as well. Indeed, these kinds of books also contain high-quality context which not only enhances creativity in their readers but it also develops their imagination. Therefore, it does not mean that the culture of the society has been declined.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that watching the TV programs or music videos as alternative habits for reading the literature is accounted as a waste of time. On the other hand, the professor disputes this point by clarifying to the fact that the culture of the people has changed. Actually, we live in an era of time that there is a wide array of expressions of culture and the brilliant song or successful movie is other forms of the culture. Admittedly, since the form of culture altered, we cannot say that they spend their time in a futile way.
Finally, the author asserts lack of financial support of the talented writers from publishers due to the shortage of public interest in terms of reading literature. The professor, though, dismisses it by subscribing to the point that despite this fact that publishers do not fund the writers same as the past, all the fault should not be assigned to readers. The truth is so difficult is their writing that it is hard for the readers to understand and perceive them; thus, they opt to occupy their time with other options such as reading some other types of books or watching the TV programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a futile way" with adverb for "futile"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e cannot say that they spend their time in a futile way. Finally, the author asserts lack of f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92917847025 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73157749677 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549575070822 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5828803043 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.846153846 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296691957536 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892414740339 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741835820519 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163893665853 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346602213856 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.