The reading passage and the lecture argued about the famous novelist Jaane Austen painting. The article states that even though there is a limited evidence to support the picture was Austine there is a good reason's to believe. However, the professor cast a doubt on the author's clime. He mentioned that the reasons are not convincing and loosely connected and he opposes each of the author's opinions.
First, the article states that Austen's family allow them to review the old edition letters to illustrate and they confirmed that the portrait was Austen. The professor opposes this point by saying the 1882 publication letter was as old as 70 years. He explained that since the evidence is ancient, no one in her family might not know how she looks like exactly.
Second, the reading avers that the face in the art seems like Cassandra sketch. The lecture contended this point by saying her family was the nuclear family. He elucidated that since the Austine family was big, most of the teenage girls are looks like same. Especially, her niece Marian resembles her
Third, the passage mentioned that although there is no evidence for the date and time of the painting, the portrait style imitates the Ozias style, a wealthy painter during Austin's time period between 1970 to 1990. The professor opposes this crime by saying that there is a time difference. William Lag started selling his art at the age of 27 years. so, he is older than the portrait art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ever, the professor cast a doubt on the authors clime. He mentioned that the reasons ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...selling his art at the age of 27 years. so, he is older than the portrait art. ...
^^
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so, he is older than the portrait art.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31303782935 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2801031337 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4285714286 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30397645326 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901832137492 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803190720937 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172552137754 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642870766712 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.