TPO 15
The article and the professor discuss the ways that can control or destroy the cane toad, an amphibian species in Central American forest, in Australia. Although both of them agree that the cane toads are destructive for Australia’s environment, the lecturer challenges the article methods for the annihilation of this species.
The first solution that the article mentions is building national fences around the place that they live. The lecturer argues that young cane toad and toad’s eggs can easily go through these fences by rivers and lakes.
Second, the article illustrates that huge numbers of volunteers can be used to capture and kill these amphibians, whereas the lecturer says that inexpert people can cause extinction on scarce local types of frogs because of the similarities between habitats and Inhabitant amphibian kinds.
The last controversy is on the virus destroying cane toads. The article’s belief is Australian cane toad are eliminated by this virus without any considerable damage. Thus, the professor shows that this kind of virus can cause extinction all the cane toads in the world due to the fact that reptiles and frogs migrant from Australia to Central America, so they can carry the virus among themselves and cause domestic cane toads to die.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and cause domestic cane toads to die.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, thus, whereas, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31067961165 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75440845799 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9983552454 49.2860985944 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406902640111 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187333051908 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854448957352 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23628707645 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105393870809 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.