TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task
The main idea of both the reading and the talk is about the numerous ways for stopping the effect of cane toad to other animals in Australia rather than insects. In the text, the author proposes some viable methods for this purpose. The lecturer challenges all the measurements that mentioned in the reading. She is of the opinion that none of these methods is effective.
Firstly, the reading passage brings up the idea that building a national fence is very practical methods for prevention of cane toad to other parts that they have not any insects. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that although the fence could prevent for adult cane toad, this approach is not convenient for young cane toad and eggs as well as. Because they can use water stream to moving to other side of the fence and they will spread quickly. Thus, this approach is not practical.
In addition, the author of the reading holds the view that by using a plethora of volunteers, it is possible to capture and destroy cane toads. The lecturer, conversely, believes that there are plenty of inexperienced volunteers that they will affect adversely. Because the cane toad is vey similar to other animals, namely frogs, so the might capture and destroy them rather than toad cane. Therefore, this approach is very irrational for reaching this aim.
Eventually, the author of the reading thinks that by using kind of disease-causing virus that developed by researcher, the population of toad cane will be controlled. The lecture, on the other hand, states that these kind of virus has numerous adverse effects on other animals and also environment. Furthermore, she mentions that because some of researchers bring toad cane to other continents so this is possible that this virus affect to other countries' animal. In addition, these animals are native to other countries so it might has bad impact on that countries' ecology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... none of these methods is effective. Firstly, the reading passage brings up t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hus, this approach is not practical. In addition, the author of the reading h...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry irrational for reaching this aim. Eventually, the author of the reading th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...lecture, on the other hand, states that these kind of virus has numerous adverse effects ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and, states that these kind of virus has numerous adverse effects on other animal...
^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the researchers') or simply say ''some researchers''.
Suggestion: some of the researchers; some researchers
... Furthermore, she mentions that because some of researchers bring toad cane to other continents so ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 563, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ries so it might has bad impact on that countries ecology.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9625 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57402894312 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471875 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7149413102 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369835512362 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118342602684 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102951413618 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237674977709 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740580807084 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.