TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task
The article states that the spreading of the cane toad in Australia should be stopped and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the elimination of these frogs by the means that the article had presented is not safe and could cause unwanted damage and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that they should build a national fence to inhibit these frogs from entering the area. The professor refutes this point by stating that it may prevent the adult one to enter but as the young toads are in the stream, the flow will carry the eggs inside. thus it will not be effective for this case.
Second, the article claims that people could voluntarily capture and destroy these frogs as a way to control the number of them which are entering the ground. However, the professor contends that untrained volunteers would kill many native frogs, especially the frogs which are already in danger of extinction as young cane toads are much like other kinds that mentioned before.
Third, the reading avers that researchers could develop a virus that can cause disease to control the cane toad population. The lecturer opposes this point by saying that it will damage the habitat where the cane toads are living. Besides, as these toads are transported to another part of the world like America for migration or science projects the virus can attack and destroy many other creatures that are living there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...m, the flow will carry the eggs inside. thus it will not be effective for this case....
^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...m, the flow will carry the eggs inside. thus it will not be effective for this case....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25600966649 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544715447154 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5771116545 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.2 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374615794829 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147503894818 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804938763102 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213600119284 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647910297015 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.