The reading passage and the lecture discuss this fascinating topic The cane toad in Australia, which is amphibian species and it would protect farmers crops by eating a harmful insect and the toad multiplied rapidly. The article claims that they know the way to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia he provides three methods to do this. The lecture cast has serious doubt about the claims made in the article, the professor said this the methods in reading is either unsuccessful or cause damage.
First of all, the author of the article states that by building a national fence. this point is challenged by the professor he states that it is hard to stop the populations of the cane toad by fences because of the young cane toad and the eggs of cane toad live near to the river or stream of water so if stop them by fences with some part in Australia there will be a river or stream by water wave they can access cross to the fences and only a few of them can grow population.
Secondly, the reading passage states that toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers, as they are easy to capture and can be captured by hand. This point rebuts by the professor he states although that captured cane toad is easy untrained volunteers can destroy Austraila native frogs and some of them are already in danger because of it is hard to identify between cane toad and other frogs.
Finally, the article states that with the help of researchers they are developing a disease-causing virus to control the cane toad populations. The lecture states that this will be horrible for cane toad in their native place Central and South America as there is a lot of reptile and amphibian goes to America for research and some reptile people buy once the virus goes to America it will cause damage in cane toad which is native this place and essential for America.
In summary, both reading the passage and lecture give some interesting fact about The cane toad but a significant amount of fact support that there is no clear reason that the methods given by reading passage can stop cane toad. Therefore reading passage failed to justify.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- People now are better at protecting the environment than people in the past. 68
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- do you agree or disagree? the rules that the whole societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict . 70
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a he provides three methods to do this. The lecture cast has serious doubt about th...
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...ates that by building a national fence. this point is challenged by the professor he...
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... by reading passage can stop cane toad. Therefore reading passage failed to justify.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 380.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63421052632 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38643877518 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431578947368 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.3546947653 49.2860985944 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.090909091 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5454545455 21.698381199 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504922246102 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200939077697 0.0996497079465 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122615674959 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295427766142 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729624699408 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.