tpo 16 the archaeology field declining in Britain
The material discusses the science of archaeology in Britain. While the reading claims that this filed faced many problems and limitations, the listening challenges this and points out that in 1990 new rules and guidelines have been issued to change the whole archaeology in Britain and made it better than it was in the past.
First, the author states that a lot of new construction in Bristish town uncovered archaeology valuable sites and destroyed them. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and mentions that before any construction work started, the construction site should be examined by professional archaeologists. The lecturer adds that if the site had historical value, archaeologists collaborated with the local government to preserve the site either by building around it or excavating it to discover it before any construction.
Second, the writer cites that the British government did not support archaeology science properly. On the contrary, the professor encounters this and posits that paying for archaeology was done by the construction company, not the government. According to the lecture, the construction company should perform the initial examination and all the work after that. The speaker says that the archaeology field is more supported today than it was in the past.
Third, the reading brings up that it was very hard for archaeologists to find jobs in Britain, so they ended up to pursue a different career. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and contends that the new rules and guidelines helped to open new job opportunities for archaeologists. The lecture points out that they did much work, such as examining sites, helping to preserve it, doing research, and processing the data. The speaker concludes that increasing jobs in the archaeology field helped to increase the number of professional archaeologists in Britain, their numbers are higher than they had ever been.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, so, third, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35526315789 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.074063758 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.114462098 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.230769231 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289017482491 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103658669126 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459810022133 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169099211397 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135604931614 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.