TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
Both the reading and article discuss the problem and limitation which archeology faced in Britain. According to the reading, the author rovides three vopmeting reason to assert that there would be a problem in archeology back then, namely losting artifact, not be enough the financial support from governmetn, and difficulties in finding job in archeology. On the contrary, the professor reject all the tree point providing by author and asserts that the new rule which was enacted in Britain change the field of archeology and improve all three areas which are mentioned by the article.
Firstly, the reading passage points out that increasing the population in Britatin causes a alot of construction which highly destroye the valuable artifact. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on this clam by saying that the new rule states that before constracting ang building the site should be examine by archologist to know whether the site is valuable in term of archeology or not. Moreover, if the site is the interest of archologist the local goverment and the archologist experts should gather together and make a plan to how preserve that. Furthurmore, they should examine and also study the site.
Secondly, the article claims that because the financial support from government is so low that the archeologist could not carry out any specific project on sites, and also the priorities of government changes. The lecture, in contrast, refutes this idea by arguing that the important part of the rule is the financial support which must be provided by construction company and support the examintation. In addition, the whole new source dedicate to this research, and this financial support allows archlogist to go far greater in terms of invetigating on site than past.
Finally, the author contends that archaeology job is very rare and it is very hard to find a suitable job in university of in government agencies. By contrast, the speaker disagrees with this opinion and averts that this new rule paved the way for a lot job which is not available in the past. Additionally, the archaeologist can work and collaborate in all the satage process including preverve managiny, processing data and publishing a new articles. Therefore, increasing the jobs cause increasing the number of employed archaelogist; moreover, they receive the highest money in comprasion the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...asing the population in Britatin causes a alot of construction which highly destr...
^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'examined'?
Suggestion: examined
...racting ang building the site should be examine by archologist to know whether the site...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'article'?
Suggestion: article
...y, processing data and publishing a new articles. Therefore, increasing the jobs cause i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21932114883 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8671474675 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532637075718 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1041353812 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.785714286 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18890227519 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605653729048 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254501741355 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105195340163 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203163393919 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.