In the given set of materials, the main topic has centered on whether the science of archaeology in Britain, has been faced with new problems or not. While the author has focused on the negative sides of this trend, the speaker in the follow-up audio material cast doubt on thoes points by providing justifications based on the new guidelines.
The first point mentioned in the article is that due to growing population, most precious sites have been destroyed without any concerns. However, the lecturer stated that in order to hinder this trend, any builders had to confer with at least an archaeologist before costructing.
Moreover, according to the essay, changing government priorities and lack of adequate amount of fund have made it hard for archaeologist to follow their projects. Nevertheless, this was questioned by the speaker as she mentioned that the construction companies have already been responsible for paying all expenditures of each step in projects instead of government.
Last but not least, there was a little opportunity in archaeology major to have a decent job. Hence, people were reluctant to pursue their education as an archaeologist. Nonetheless, according to the lecturer, based on the new apporoach of guildelines, a wide range of career opportunities were available during the periods of each projects.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'while', 'at least']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241525423729 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.169491525424 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0932203389831 0.0723426182421 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0381355932203 0.0435111971325 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0169491525424 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.165254237288 0.128828473217 128% => OK
Participles: 0.0847457627119 0.0370669169778 229% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.08812430369 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338983050847 0.0208969081088 162% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127118644068 0.128158765124 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0114777025283 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1342.0 1645.83664459 82% => OK
No of words: 213.0 271.125827815 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30046948357 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04852973271 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384976525822 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291079812207 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.239436619718 0.187439937562 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.183098591549 0.113142543107 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08812430369 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647887323944 0.539623497131 120% => OK
Word variations: 68.8691536046 53.8517498576 128% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6666666667 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8351541502 49.3711431718 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.111111111 132.220823453 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.878197800319 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 52.7746478873 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 2.18867924528 1.90840788429 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.607367570221 0.549887131256 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129152531095 0.142949733639 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0801034546064 0.0787303798458 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666845596702 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152894836412 0.139662658121 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.278278960103 0.266732575781 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113623457686 0.103435571967 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.258491485292 0.414875509568 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0554599445863 0.0530846634433 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397671178878 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592214233355 0.0528353158467 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.