The author of the reading states that archeology, which is a science about unearthing and studying old artifacts, had some problems and restrictions in the past century in the united kingdom. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He says that the new guideline that the government has established is conversely improved many aspects of archeology.
First of all, the author points out that because new building project a lot of valuable artifacts were destroyed as builders did not care about them. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that according to the guideline building companies have to exam the sites before digging foundations to see if it has any archeological value.
Secondly, the author contends that many archeologists had poor financial support from the government to make researches. The lecturer rebuts this argument by saying that due to the new rules, construction companies have to fund the archeological works. Thus, helped to increase the number of studies and investigations.
Finally, the author states that there were only a few positions available for archeologists and that it was hard to build a career. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that because of the new guideline the companies have to hire only archeologists to do all the works starting from examining the site to writing reports. So, that is mean that there a lot of job opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly improved many aspects of archeology. First of all, the author points out that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e number of studies and investigations. Finally, the author states that there we...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... examining the site to writing reports. So, that is mean that there a lot of job opportu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12875536481 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97262278345 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575107296137 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3285470651 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5833333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193061020704 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612244335556 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457911941793 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112317287329 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018062688276 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.