The reading and the listening both are about the old cultural artifacts which are important tools to study the roman civilization. The author believes that science of archeologist faces many serious problems during the study of historical things. He provides three main problem to support the statement. The lecturer challenges the statement made by the writer. He is of opinion that new laws and new guidelines has provided vast opportunities for researchers to conduct the research.
First of all, the writer suggests that excessive population is the cause of industrialization, which brings many new constructions in the Britain. It is mentioned that new construction diminishes many old artifacts. However, the lecturer challenges this point by asserting that new guidelines make it clear that construction can not progress until the artifacts and old documents are not preserved. He claims that first researchers will check the old documents and after their permission construction work can go in the process.
Secondly, the writer thinks that financial support for archeologist is very less. He says that due to change in the priorities of the government, the funds and grants are not given to the researchers, so most of the significant research project could not established. The lecturer, on, the other hand, posits that new guidelines has assured that funds and financial support will be provided by the construction company. This is the other way to increase the financial support for the archeological department.
In the last, it is stated that, there are very few jobs in the archeology line and sometimes researchers are not paid. The author asserts that most of the researcher change their career because of the unemployment in this field. The lecturer, on the flip side, rebuts that high-salary jobs are created for the experts. On the different stage of the research different people will do work and, in this way, number of jobs are increased in the research science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'problem' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'problems'.
Suggestion: problems
...storical things. He provides three main problem to support the statement. The lecturer ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'establish'
Suggestion: establish
... significant research project could not established. The lecturer, on, the other hand, posi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26332288401 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00398872683 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498432601881 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8383010219 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7647058824 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242445454125 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772552760925 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415740568133 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142855659051 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335222740174 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.