TPO 17-integerated
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that the population of the birds is affected by some factors resulting from human population growth. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas unconvincing and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author of the passage claims that growing human populations and settlements along with expanding urban areas have destroyed the birds' habitats. On the contrary, the lecturer declares that although urban development has reduced the number of some types of the birds, it has created better and larger habitat for the other types. Additionally, people are complaining about the increased number of birds in the cities in recent years. For example, the number of seagulls and pigeons have increased and consequently, they have attracted some birds such as hawks which prey pigeons and rodents.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the reading passage that expansion of the agricultural lands and activities due to providing enough food for large human population has devastated the possible dwellings for birds. In contrast, the professor asserts that the lands used for agriculture is shrinking in the U.S. every year because more productive crops are going to be produced and there is no need to destroy wilderness areas.
Finally, the reading passage touches on the effects of the chemical pesticides on food chain and thereby, dwindling number of the birds. Conversely, the lecturer claims that although traditional pesticides had negative effect on the nature, people have recognized their harmful impacts and made two useful changes. First, new and much less toxic pests have been made. Second, new kind of pest resisting crops, which are genetically unattractive to the pest, have been produced. Therefore, the pesticides do not harm the birds anymore.
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'such as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269592476489 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.166144200627 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0723426182421 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0407523510972 0.0435111971325 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0156739811912 0.0277247811725 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12539184953 0.128828473217 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0721003134796 0.0370669169778 195% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.71885531802 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0156739811912 0.0208969081088 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12539184953 0.128158765124 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00626959247649 0.0114777025283 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1824.0 1645.83664459 111% => OK
No of words: 287.0 271.125827815 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35540069686 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.407665505226 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.313588850174 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229965156794 0.187439937562 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156794425087 0.113142543107 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71885531802 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 61.9379457824 53.8517498576 115% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0769230769 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9360537834 49.3711431718 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.307692308 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 0.878197800319 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 53.4358080943 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 2.0985915493 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.621071021122 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129228557509 0.142949733639 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0600246308168 0.0787303798458 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.622652071909 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143174291806 0.139662658121 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294179462693 0.266732575781 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932209074625 0.103435571967 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399033702228 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0501550220757 0.0530846634433 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.453263247669 0.40443939384 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371116141198 0.0528353158467 70% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.