TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about adverse influence of human and agricuture growth to wildlife, especially bird populations. In the text, the author believes that there are three consequences of human growth that leads to birds decline. The lecturer challenges all the viable theories that are mentioned in the reading. She id of the opinion that none of these claims is convincing.
Firstly, the author asserts that human population growth lead to dwindles the size of natural hapitats such as forests and wetlands for birds. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that although some kinds of birds are decreced in some areas, these areas are provided new habitat for others. Furthermore, she argues that the reaserch have been shown that the number of some birds such as pigins are increced in subburns area.
In addition, the reading passge claims that the increase of agricultural activities for fulfilling the humans needs leads to destruction of birds habitat. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that the agricutural activities do not affect the birds habits like mentioned in the reading. Moreover, she says that in the United States farmers use a differents kind of crop in diffrents seasons and by doing this the lands will not be more destructed. Also, she beleives that there are not extra lands in the US.
Eventually, the author holds the view that using the chemical pesticides would advesely affect the number of birds population. The lecturer, although, dismisses it by pointing out that the traditional psticides that were used in the past was harmful, but the new developed pesticides are not very harmful to bird population and also these are used less than past. Furthermore, she expalins that the new crops which are very resistant are replaced with former plants. Therefore, the readings calims could not be reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The main idea of both the passage and th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bird'.
Suggestion: bird
...sequences of human growth that leads to birds decline. The lecturer challenges all th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... none of these claims is convincing. Firstly, the author asserts that human p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'dwindle'.
Suggestion: dwindle
...ts that human population growth lead to dwindles the size of natural hapitats such as f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to dwindles the size of natural hapitats such as forests and wetlands for birds. ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igins are increced in subburns area. In addition, the reading passge claims t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading passge claims that the increase of agricultural activities for fulfilling t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...there are not extra lands in the US. Eventually, the author holds the view th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, the author holds the view that using the chemical pesticides would advesely a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as for, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11003236246 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63961440886 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2166877028 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.266666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341739192149 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953051770675 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068921802347 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188410923006 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388367679114 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.