TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b

The reading states that the population of birds declining because of the rapid growth of the humans including the urban development, the declining of wilderness areas and the poison dedicated to the insects and pets may harm the birds. However, the professor cast doubt on each idea of the author.

First and foremost, the article suggests that because of the suburban places are increasing, the areas suitable for birds to live are diminishing. On the other hand, the lecturer rejected that point by saying that some kinds of birds may not adapt to the urban life, but there are many birds that are living in urban. Also, she said that the construction workers of urban development complaining about the increasing population of birds.

Secondly, the reading indicates that most wild areas used in agriculture which causes a declining of wilderness for birds. In contrast, the lecturer argued the expansion of the agricultural use of land is decreasing time to time in the US. Furthermore, she said American agriculture has developed grains that is beneficial and efficient than others even though in small areas, so, they do not need to destroy the wild lands.

Lastly, the passage claims that the poison called pesticides, which are dedicated to killing the harmful insects to the agriculture or home pets may appear on the water and the food of birds which causes the declining of the birds. Nonetheless, the lecturer made a counterclaim to this idea by explaining that people developed new crops that is a pet resistant and not attract birds.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0503875969 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71442108856 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519379844961 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0475268745 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.3 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277521150589 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102344284368 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675222744708 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16228474221 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164181149026 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.