The article and the lecture bote are argued about the extinction of the bird population. The article states that in the United States the bird population decline drastically and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor explained that the reading passage clime fewer and fewer birds are unconvincing and he opposes each of the author's opinion.
First, the reading avers that the rapid growth of the human population and their settlements leads to develop the new buildings and the offices, as a result, it distracts the traditional habitat of the birds. The professor explained that the urban population growth is only bad for the certain species. He further explained that some kind of the bird species like pigeons is drastically improving in the cities and the people from it keep on complaining. so he mentioned that the decline of the bird species in uneven and the uniform declination is not true.
Second, the passage climes that excessive conversion of the wilder land to farming stop the bird population. The professor contended this point by saying in the modern day's people are using less land for the cultivation. He illustrated that since the technology is developing the new variety of the food products are cultivating in a small land so the farmers no need to disturb the wild area.
Third, the article climes that increasing the chemical substance in the farming harms the birds. The professor cast a doubt in this point by saying it is not correct in the future. He mentioned that although the traditional pesticides kill the birds, in the modern generation people are implementing the advanced technology like pesticide resistance crops and the new and less toxic pesticide preparation which minimizing the use of the traditional pest5icides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...unconvincing and he opposes each of the authors opinion. First, the reading avers that...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...the people from it keep on complaining. so he mentioned that the decline of the bi...
^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the use of the traditional pest5icides.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11683848797 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78638432401 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491408934708 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6268676986 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.538461538 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258638088885 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871188260085 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408910031831 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149828199854 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406404423879 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.