TPO 17
Birds'decline in united state
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on what has caused the population of birds reduction in the united State. The penman puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer proposes that habitat of birds are reducing because of human's increasing population and their need for more buildings and establishments. On the other hand, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, urban expanding provides better and larger areas for birds. For example, the number of pigeons in the streets are increasing now. If population of some species are shrinking, other ones are growing.
The second point offered by the author is that needing more land for agriculture diminishes the bird's habitat. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that due to new technology for increasing crop efficiency, less and less in used farmland exist each year. As a result, there is no need for usage of new land.
Last, the reading passage suggests that more need to pesticides used in agricultural activities and other chemicals pollute water and environment. Thus, they indirectly damage to birds. However, the lecturer holds a different view. She explains that awareness among people has increased in 2 ways. First, new and much less pesticides are using for producing crops. Second, pest-resistance crops are developing now that do not need to pesticides. In addition, they do not harm birds at all.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text according above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ore land for agriculture diminishes the birds habitat. On the contrary, the professor...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pesticides is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ncreased in 2 ways. First, new and much less pesticides are using for producing crop...
^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the text according above reasons.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, as for, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1825095057 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74057194352 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1334579179 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7222222222 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6111111111 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295682902298 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784968801008 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072012135325 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134194769854 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747232154345 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.