The reading and the lecture are both about the solution of recent overall population decreasing of Torreya taxifoha trees. The author points out three probable solutions of it and tries to establish his point. However, the professor rebuts the article's points by saying that none of those are effective solutions to this problems.
First of all, the writer suggests that if people reestablish Torreya in the same location, the northern part of Florida, where those trees get suitable cold temperature and wetland microclimate, the total population of Torreya trees will increase in future. The professor, on the other hand, challenges this idea and states that unlikely those microclimates will provide the proper environment to flourish Torreya trees because those areas are not cooler for the whole year. Moreover, such microclimate is not always wetland, sometimes they become dried land. Therefore, the population of Torreya cannot be recover by taking this step.
The second solution posited in the reading is to relocate the location of Torreya land from Florida to further north, where the temperature is really lower. He further says that assisted migration might be the best solution for this matter. However, the professor disproves this point by explaining an example of such measure. She implies that Black trees once relocated, and the outcome of this relocation was very dangerous to the native trees since people assist only the particular trees. She added that if again such relocations do, the similar result might occur.
Finally, researching the seeds and saplings to find out the problems of declining those trees is the best solution, is addressed in the reading. Since more deep research on this will find the effective solution of keeping those trees in the world, a more intense study should do. This point is refuted by the professor. She thinks that small-scale study of seeds and saplings of those trees might not able to find the culprits. She also says that a large diverse trees' seeds must need to reserve and check to finding the problems, but this task is not possible for a research center.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...one of those are effective solutions to this problems. First of all, the writer ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...pulation of Torreya trees will increase in future. The professor, on the other hand, chal...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15273775216 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54561651529 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538904899135 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.579549887 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280080361453 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871212460754 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762551634135 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165222280694 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926178289295 0.0443174109184 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.