The reading specifies there are three main ways to address the decline of Torreya. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and brings up three reasons to reject the specific points made in the reading passage.
First of all, the author asserts that they can re-establish Torreya in the original location in which it grew for several years ago. Nevertheless, the lecturer states that coolest lands changes gradually. Global warming can be considered as main reason. In addition, wetlands dried. Indeed, there is nowhere in its original microclimate to address all its needs.
Second, according to the reading, they can move Torreya to a totally different climate and location, not necessarily near its Florida microclimate. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts the idea reasoning that one experience revealed when another species was located in a location far from its original location. The moved tree killed many other species engendered to extinction. Consequently, such these movements lead to unpredictable consequences.
Third, based on the reading, Torreya can be preserved in research centres. In addition to better preservation, researchers can conduct their experiments on this species. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses the idea due to researchers cannot resist diseases. The preserved environment should provide a population genetically diverse to withstand diseases. It is unlikely these places have capacity.
Therefore, the specific points made in the reading do not make sense.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60262008734 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95837267418 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64192139738 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8751752092 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4705882353 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4705882353 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278028686517 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756069020362 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794424385809 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126808549241 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642584338707 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.