Both the reading and professor offer opposing views for the ways to address the decline of the Torreya. While the passage states that adept people are trying some ways to prevent it, the lecturer repudiates the points mentioned in the article.
First, the passage posits that Torreya can be saved by planting them in the Northern Florida which has wetter and cooler climate as compared to the surrounding region's which is relatively dry,warm climate. The lecturer refutes this point by saying that this soution is not going to work as the wetlands of Northern Florida have been dried out due to global climatic changes.
Second, the article mentions that growing Torreya in totally different cooler area can help them to flourish. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this point by giving an example of the black locust tree which was tried to grow in the new environment. It grown so fast that it killed other endangered plants of the area. Thus, the movement of plants or trees may have unpredicted consequences.
Third, the reading says that Toerrya can be grown in the reasearch centers in the controlled environment. The professor refutes this by saying that large and diverse population may contract diseases thus, may not able to survive in the long term.
Clearly, the disparity exists between the reading and listening but the lecturer provides more legitimate and tangible facts. Thus, the passage fails to justify its point towards professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , warm
...rounding regions which is relatively dry,warm climate. The lecturer refutes this poin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, third, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10416666667 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47206265091 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4209619711 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266551131468 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897878533559 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862246000482 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130502458474 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894666222736 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.