TPO 19
The lecturer and the reading discuss a new tactic that company use for sailing their products, and it names buzzing. Although the passage claims some arguments against this theory, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading passage points out that a person praising a product does not tell true about products. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that buzz must know how products are work. Hence, they use their product. If these products are good, they start to sell them. Therefore, they tell true about goods which they sell them.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that people lesson less critically to buzzers, as a result of not knowing that they are paid to do this job, the man argues that this claim is not true. When people want to buy their product, they would ask a lot of question about the product such as price, service, and how long are they use the product. If the buzz cannot answer the question effectively, they will not buy the products.
Finally, although the passage says that buzzing results in the spread of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that if the product was not good and the company was not prosperous, they would not be able to hire buzzers. Thus, due to the good quality of the products, people will enjoy using them as well as being satisfied. As a result, the good experience of using the product will help people to become more close and trustful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89097744361 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34617792395 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2196177907 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379959340851 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147230631682 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604570292344 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230847767568 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987313347778 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.