The reading and the lecture are both about buzzing which describes as company using a new tectic for sell the product. The author of the reading believes that do not reveal that they are being paid to promote anything and randomly praise the product. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in tyhe article. He thinks that critics impression on buzzers is'nt right.
First of all, The author claims that buzzers always give incorrect information about the product. He believes that buzzer praising a product is being paid to praise the product and that has big difference. This point is rebutted by the lecturer. He suggests that buzzers always get truth and misleading information not support by the company. The advertiser paid attention on the buzzing so if it fail, the business will destroy.
Secondly, The author state that buzzers pretend and they are just private individuals, consumers listen less critically than they should. And he argues that it could really harm the comsumers. This argument is challenged by the lecture. He state that buzzers tell something about product such as prize, quality. He is of this opinion that it responsible for good sell and misleading the author claims.
Finally, The author mentions that buzzers have a hidden things that will be harmful for social relationship and fell dishonesty. The lecturer, On the other hand , feels that they are honest because by this buzzing they improve their business skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: FOR_SELL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for sale'?
Suggestion: for sale
...describes as company using a new tectic for sell the product. The author of the reading ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ything and randomly praise the product. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
...ms made in tyhe article. He thinks that critics impression on buzzers isnt right. Fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...inks that critics impression on buzzers isnt right. First of all, The author clai...
^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'differenced'.
Suggestion: differenced
... to praise the product and that has big difference. This point is rebutted by the lecturer...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fails'?
Suggestion: fails
... paid attention on the buzzing so if it fail, the business will destroy. Secondly...
^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...honesty. The lecturer, On the other hand , feels that they are honest because by t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0875 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48308268618 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554166666667 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3904344506 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3125 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396823272622 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117604762687 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893757125391 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240928513137 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113317224465 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.