TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task
The article critics a new tactic of advertisement called buzzing from three points of view. However, the professor refutes each of the author's points.
First, the reading says that consumers who don't know a product is buzzed can't make a correct decision to buy. On the other hand, the professor disputes this point by stating that companies hire only people who think their products really good. He claims that buzzers tell the truth about products.
Second, the article states that buzzers make consumers think about products less critically. Nonetheless, the professor says that consumers don't automatically believe what buzzers say and ask a lot of questions about products. He also explains that consumers don't buy products if buzzers don't answer the questions from them.
Third, the reading states that buzzing can cause a problem that results in the spread of mistrust. However, the professor opposes this point by claiming that advertising companies hire buzzers for the products that they think really good. According to the professor, advertisers understand the possibility to make buzzers distrust so they make a choice for buzzing carefully.
Therefore, the main points made by the professor cast doubt on the main points made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st, the reading says that consumers who dont know a product is buzzed cant make a co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...umers who dont know a product is buzzed cant make a correct decision to buy. On the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...less, the professor says that consumers dont automatically believe what buzzers say ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...oducts. He also explains that consumers dont buy products if buzzers dont answer the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... consumers dont buy products if buzzers dont answer the questions from them. Thir...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, really, second, so, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59566947048 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.519185227 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27455961588 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106651586721 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640895361825 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14437855378 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875095863062 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.