TPO 2
The reading passage claims that the number of yellow cedars, a kind of tree which is widespread in North America is/has been decreasing for a couple of decades now. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas implausible and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that a kind of insect named beetle is one of the main reasons of this phenomenon. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that healthy trees of yellow cedar are resistance againstresistant to beetles' attack since some parts of the trees which are attacked by beetles are saturated with a kind of chemical which is lethal for beetles. If the insect attacks the tree, the insect is damaged itself because of the existence of that chemical.
Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that another reason is of! this evidence is that, these trees are a part of brown bears' diet. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that although bears damage the trees, they are not the main cause of this declining/decline in population of these trees. He claims that the declining in population of trees has happened in some areas where no bear has/bears have ever lived there. For instance, no bear lives off the coast and in on the islands where the yellow cedar trees have died. He believes that this evidence reveals the fact that bears are not responsible.
Finally, the reading holds the view that climate change is another reason of happening/this trend/phenomenon. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that if changes of climate were responsible, many other trees of other kinds should have died too. He also claims that climate change may make the trees more sensitive but it is not the reason of their death.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...sage asserts that another reason is of! this evidence is that, these trees are a par...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265243902439 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.15243902439 0.158904122519 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0640243902439 0.0723426182421 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0396341463415 0.0435111971325 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243902439024 0.0277247811725 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.15243902439 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0335365853659 0.0370669169778 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72695799634 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00914634146341 0.0208969081088 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0030487804878 0.00154638098197 197% => OK
Determiners: 0.155487804878 0.128158765124 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00609756097561 0.0158828679856 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0182926829268 0.0114777025283 159% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1757.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95593220339 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335593220339 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227118644068 0.287516216867 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.145762711864 0.187439937562 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0983050847458 0.113142543107 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72695799634 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535593220339 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.5921867934 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0714285714 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2890268038 49.3711431718 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 43.7832929782 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 2.08450704225 1.90840788429 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141956450041 0.142949733639 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0879304292176 0.0787303798458 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.633465545836 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123788131957 0.139662658121 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481671516177 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0131781474969 0.0530846634433 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.