In term of whether there were many disadvantages of "let it burn" policy in Yelooestone. The reading and lecture both contradictory to each other.
First, the reading states that a huge number of trees and vegetation had been destroied due to this fire. On the other hand, the professor refutes this notion by saying that even though some vegetation had been scorched, many vegetation colonised by new palnts and that gave a new opportunity to other palnts to grow. So, the diverisity of tha plants in Yellowstone had been increased. Moreover, the trees destroied but, other plants in the open heated area had been grown. Furthermore, many plants started to germinate in the high level of heat after the fire.
Second, contrary to the belief in the reading passage that there was a negative effect of this fire on the wildlife. the professor argues by saying that this fire would able to create new opportunity and new habitat to the small animals like rabbit and hares because many preditors came to live in the same area. So, they found a good source of food and benifites.
Finally, the article avers that the local economy had been affected because many tourists stoped to visit the Yellowstone. However, the professor questions this idea by pointing out the yellowstone fire caused by low rainfull and strong wind. Furthermore, the Yellowstone did not see fire anymore. As a result, the visitors started to come each year after that. This is directly contradicted what is the passage indicated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun vegetation seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much vegetation', 'a good deal of vegetation'.
Suggestion: much vegetation; a good deal of vegetation
...ough some vegetation had been scorched, many vegetation colonised by new palnts and that gave a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ve effect of this fire on the wildlife. the professor argues by saying that this fi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98814229249 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67363184999 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549407114625 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0699715554 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1333333333 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269861202966 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085290815154 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476047381798 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15290472178 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234356455479 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.