The reading passage and the lecture are both about consequences of Yellowstone fire. The author of the snippet believe that devastating consequences of fire bring tremendous damage to the forest. On the other hand, the lecturer considers that the statements made in the reading passage are wrong and she reinforces her opinion by providing several examples.
First of all, there is indicated in the reading passage that third of the land had been scortherd because of the fire. However, the speaker asserts, that a fire is always an opportunity for new species to thrive. Also, fire is important for germination of seeds, which were sleeping for a lot of years. Consequently, due to the fire species of small plants will be dominate in the ecosystem, and it is also positive for different animals.
The subsequent lecturer argument is related to the statement made in the excerpt that a lot of species ought to escape the forest of the Yellowstone because of the fire and some of the animals died in the fire. The lecturer disputes that by claiming that instead this animals came new one, such as rabbits, which are able to feed by the new plants ecosystem and this animals will orginise the new ecosystem, which wouldn’t be worse then one destroyed by fire.
Finally, there is denoted in the reading fragment that small attraction of tourists caused local economical decline. However, the lecturer states that such fires as Yellowstone don’t happen every season to lead to the economical problems. Likewise, this fire was a coincedence, due to the hot weather and dry summer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the Yellowstone because of the fire and some of the animals died in the fire. The lecturer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
...bits, which are able to feed by the new plants ecosystem and this animals will orginis...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse than'?
Suggestion: worse than
...e new ecosystem, which wouldn't be worse then one destroyed by fire. Finally, ther...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...all attraction of tourists caused local economical decline. However, the lecturer states t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...os;t happen every season to lead to the economical problems. Likewise, this fire was a coi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, likewise, so, then, third, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02264150943 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74024110697 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516981132075 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0179706901 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274848618509 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111363284478 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505834629611 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163935460906 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533043592556 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.