the article and the lecture both are disputed about the consequences of the let it burn policy. The article states that it damages a lot of wild range and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor mentioned that although some time burns disturb the national ecosystem they also a part of the that and it enhance the colonization of new species and the plants.
First, the article avers that yellow stone park fire damages a huge count of park trees and other vegetation. The professor opposes this point by saying it provided the space for the new plants. He explained that some seeds need extreme heat to germinate so fire encourages to develop such a kind of plants.
Second, The passage climes that let it be fire policy damage the park wildlife either escape from the forest or some small animals might be destroyed in it. The professor contended this point by saying it create the new opportunity for small species. He explained that woodland fire create habitation to small animals like rabbits and it also supports to protect them from the predators.
Third, the reading posts that this policy impact on tourism and the local economy. The professor cast a doubt on this point by saying the yellow stone fire happened once in 1960 and it is unusual. He illustrated that the tourists are started visiting the park next year after the fire but the other factors like rainfall and drought conditions are considerable factors to limit the visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the article and the lecture both are disput...
^^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
...tem they also a part of the that and it enhance the colonization of new species and the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...me heat to germinate so fire encourages to develop such a kind of plants. Second, The pas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...essor contended this point by saying it create the new opportunity for small species. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85258964143 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4197341612 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9176072115 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256738446184 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885418588076 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595043479684 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149678891912 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316554868476 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.