In the given set of material, the author talks about the lethal consequences of the “let it burn policy” and supports the replacement of this policy by another policy that is to extinguish forest fires as soon as it occurs. The passage indicates three kinds of damages that are caused by the old policy. However, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubts on those reasons by providing evidences.
First, the passage states that the park’s fire leads to devastation of the vegetation and trees. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point and explains that in reality this provides a opportunity to the smaller plants to grow. Moreover, there are several seeds that require very high temperature to germinate and this policy is suitable for the growth of such seeds. Hence, it is helpful in the overall development of the park’s vegetation and the park was colonized quickly after the fire of 1988.
Second, the reading suggests that it causes damage to the park’s animals to a great extent. Conversely, the professor refutes this idea and elaborates that just like plants there are various small animals that are not able to carry on because of the larger animals for example rabbits and hairs. But due to this policy these animals they get chance to live and thus there population is increased. Therefore, this idea is also proved by the lecturer invalid.
Third, the reading in the last depicts that it has negative effect on the economy of the local community. The speaker rebuts this statement and argues that in the year 1988 it was not the forest fire that affected the tourism and economy. Indeed, there were many other factors like less rainfall and unusually stronger winds that caused the economy downfall. But in the next year and each year after that a lot of tourists keep coming back to the park and
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the old policy. However, the speaker in the follow up material cast doubts on those reason...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... explains that in reality this provides a opportunity to the smaller plants to gr...
^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourists keep coming back to the park and
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, thus, for example, in contrast, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92675159236 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50995219773 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4848632668 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28690769999 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842388669835 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565597725144 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161875041844 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283776610964 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.