TPO 21
The article and lecture both discuss genetically modified trees. The article claims planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits and provides three reasons to support it. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and refutes each of the reasons.
Firstly, the professor avers that this genetically modified trees are resistant to only one typical condition. Actually, these trees are uniform. So, if the climates changes or new pests appear these threes will be destoyed. But the text contends that these trees are harder than nature threes.
Secondly, the lecturer states genetically modified trees have a great costs. Farmers should pay more money for buying them. Even at some points, the farmers should pay the supplier every time after their products had been produced. On the other hand, the article declares these trees promis to bring a number of economic benefits to farmers due to the number factors such as tending to grow faster, giving the greater yields, and etcetera.
Finally, the professor mentions that genetically modified trees damage local trees. Typically, these trees are are planted among natural trees. As a result, these trees crowding out the natural trees. But the text claims these trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. Because they can be designed how they can grow fast and satisfy the demand for wood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...age local trees. Typically, these trees are are planted among natural trees. As a resul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26991150442 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40842947577 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588495575221 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1194905124 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4375 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.125 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493891769878 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163608524585 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087895598969 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294302055042 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064877717304 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.